E.A. Sbrodova, V.V. Tarkaev, E.A. Fominykh, E.V. Shumakova. Virtual 3-manifolds of complexity 1 and 2 ... P. 257-264

Matveev in 2009 introduced the notion of virtual 3-manifold, which generalizes the classical notion of 3-manifold. A virtual manifold is an equivalence class of so-called special polyhedra. Each virtual manifold determines a 3-manifold with nonempty boundary and $\mathbb{R}P^2$-singularities. Many invariants of manifolds, such as Turaev-Viro invariants, can be extended to virtual manifolds. The complexity of a virtual 3-manifold is $k$ if its equivalence class contains a special polyhedron with $k$ true vertices and contains no special polyhedra with a smaller number of true vertices. In this paper we give a complete list of virtual 3-manifolds of complexity 1 and present two-sided bounds for the number of virtual 3-manifolds of complexity 2. The question of the complete classification for virtual 3-manifolds of complexity 2 remains open.

Keywords: virtual 3-manifold, classification, complexity.

The paper was received by the Editorial Office on September 30, 2017

Elena Aleksandrovna Sbrodova, Cand. Sci.(Phys.-Math.), Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk,
454001 Russia, e-mail: sbrodova@csu.ru .

Vladimir Viktorovich Tarkaev, Cand. Sci.(Phys.-Math.), Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics and
Mechanics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, 620990 Russia;
Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, 454001 Russia, e-mail: v.tarkaev@gmail.com.

Evgeny Anatol’evich Fominykh, Dr. Phys.-Math. Sci., Prof., Krasovskii Institute of Mathematics
and Mechanics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, 620990 Russia;
Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, 454001 Russia, e-mail: efominykh@gmail.com.

Ekaterina Valer’evna Shumakova, Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, 454001 Russia,
e-mail: shumakova_kate@mail.ru .

REFERENCES

1.   Matveev S.V. Virtual 3-manifolds. Sib. Elektron. Mat. Izv., 2009, vol. 6, pp. 518-521.

2.   Vesnin  A.Yu.,  Turaev V.G.,  Fominykh E.A. Complexity of virtual 3-manifolds.  Sb. Math., 2016, vol. 207, no. 11, pp. 1493-1511. doi: 10.1070/SM8700.

3.   Matveev S. Algorithmic topology and classification of 3-manifolds. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2007. Ser. Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics, vol. 9, 492 p. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-45899-9.

4.   Turaev V.G., Viro O.Y. State sum invariants of $3$-manifolds and quantum $6j$-symbols. Topology, 1992, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 865-902. doi: 10.1016/0040-9383(92)90015-A.

5.   Burton B. The pachner graph and the simplification of 3-sphere triangulations. Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual symposium on Computational geometry (SCG'11), ACM, New York. 2011, pp. 153-162. doi: 10.1145/1998196.1998220.

6.   Atlas of 3-Manifolds [site]: A free software 3-manifold recognizer. Available at: http://matlas.math.csu.ru/  (Access date:  15.09.2017).

7.   Culler M., Dunfield N., Goerner M., Weeks J. SnapPy, a computer program for studying the geometry and topology of $3$-manifolds. Available at: http://snappy.computop.org/  (Access date:  15.09.2017).

8.   Fujii M. Hyperbolic $3$-manifolds with totally geodesic boundary which are decomposed into hyperbolic truncated tetrahedra. Tokyo J. Math., 1990, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 353-373. doi: 10.3836/tjm/1270132267.

9.   Callahan P., Hildebrand M., Weeks J. A census of cusped hyperbolic $3$-manifolds. Mathematics of Computation, 1999, vol. 68, no. 225, pp. 321-332. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-99-01036-4.